Elizabeth Liddle, Joe Felsenstein, and other evotards, Still Misrepresenting CSI
I tried and tried to tell them that CSI pertains to origins, but their heads are so far up their asses that they cannot understand.
I posted the following quote from "No Free Lunch" but as with several other of my correcting posts, it most likely won't be posted:
The central problem of biology is therefore not simply the origin of information but the origin of complex specified information.- page 149- the sentence starting the very next paragraph after what Joe F quoted.
Just read the stupidity- oleg thinks evolution actually selects- Elizabeth thinks that because GAs can produce SC/ CSI that means blind and undirected processes can- what is wrong with her? Someone designs something to solve a problem, it solves the problem and design had nothing to do with it?
As for Joe Felsenstein, he still refuses to understand that CSI pertains to origins and thinks if he quote-mines "No Free Lunch" he can make his case.
The funny part is each of them are proud of their ignorance...